[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
On Jul 21, 9:57am, Stein Gjoen wrote:
> Subject: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create
packages?)
>
> Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> "S" == Stein Gjoen <sgjoen@mail.nyx.net> writes:
> >
> > S> I suggest we comply with the standards : /usr/share/doc/HOWTO
> >
> > Agreed. And doc/FAQ and doc/GUIDES, but doc/HOWTO/mini
>
> I was under the impression that we were going to remove the
> distinction between HOWTOs and mini-HOWTOs. Why then keep that
> old sub directory? Now that ./doc is positioned below ./share
> I would have thought this is an excellent opportunity to remove
> old cruft.
>
> At the same time we should try to decide on the place for
> other formats. A suggestion to star the ball rolling
>
> /
> usr
> share
> HOWTO - the HOWTOs in HTML format goes here
> ascii - same HOWTOS but as plain text
> PDF - same HOWTOS but as PDF
> PostScript
> SGML
> GUIDES - the Guides in HTML format
> ascii
> PDF
> PostScript
> SGML
>
> What about the FAQs? Are they still available as plain text only?
No.
>From the handful of FAQs we have available (http://www.linuxdoc.org/FAQ/)
5 are in HTML and 9 are in plain text (only).
Ferg
--
Greg Ferguson - s/w engr / mtlhd | gferg@sgi.com
SGI Tech Pubs - http://techpubs.sgi.com |
Linux Doc Project - http://www.linuxdoc.org |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org