Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) R. Bush
Request for Comments: 7128 Internet Initiative Japan
Category: Informational R. Austein
ISSN: 2070-1721 Dragon Research Labs
K. Patel
Cisco Systems
H. Gredler
Juniper Networks, Inc.
M. Waehlisch
FU Berlin
February 2014
Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Router Implementation Report
Abstract
This document is an implementation report for the Resource Public Key
Infrastructure (RPKI) Router protocol as defined in RFC 6810. The
authors did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by
respondents. The respondents are experts with the implementations
they reported on, and their responses are considered authoritative
for the implementations for which their responses represent. The
respondents were asked to only use the "YES" answer if the feature
had at least been tested in the lab.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7128.
Bush, et al. Informational [Page 1]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Implementation Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Protocol Data Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Protocol Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Protocol Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Error Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Incremental Updates Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8. Session ID Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9. Incremental Session Startup Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10. Interoperable Implementations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.1. Cisco Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.2. Juniper Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.3. rpki.net Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.4. RIPE NCC Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.5. RTRlib Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10.6. BBN RPSTIR Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 12. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Bush, et al. Informational [Page 2]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 1. Introduction In order to formally validate the origin Autonomous Systems (ASes) of BGP announcements, routers need a simple but reliable mechanism to receive Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) [RFC6810] prefix origin data from a trusted cache. The RPKI Router protocol defined in [RFC6810] provides a mechanism to deliver validated prefix origin data to routers. This document provides an implementation report for the RPKI Router protocol as defined in RFC 6810 [RFC6810]. The authors did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by respondents or by any alternative means. The respondents are experts with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are considered authoritative for the implementations for which their responses represent. Respondents were asked to only use the "YES" answer if the feature had at least been tested in the lab. 2. Implementation Forms Contact and implementation information for person filling out this form: IOS Name: Keyur Patel Email: keyupate@cisco.com Vendor: Cisco Systems, Inc. Release: IOS Protocol Role: Client XR Name: Forhad Ahmed Email:foahmed@cisco.com Vendor: Cisco Systems, Inc. Release: IOS-XR Protocol Role: Client JUNOS Name: Hannes Gredler Email: hannes@juniper.net Vendor: Juniper Networks, Inc. Release: JUNOS Protocol Role: Client Bush, et al. Informational [Page 3]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 rpki.net Name: Rob Austein Email: sra@hactrn.net Vendor: rpki.net project Release: <http://subvert-rpki.hactrn.net/trunk/> Protocol Role: Client, Server NCC Name: Tim Bruijnzeels Email: tim@ripe.net Vendor: RIPE NCC Release: RIPE NCC validator-app 2.0.0 <https://github.com/RIPE-NCC /rpki-validator> Protocol Role: Server RTRlib Name: Fabian Holler, Matthias Waehlisch Email: waehlisch@ieee.org Vendor: HAW Hamburg, FU Berlin, RTRlib project Release: RTRlib 0.2 <http://rpki.realmv6.org/> Protocol Role: Client BBN Name: David Mandelberg, Andrew Chi Email: dmandelb@bbn.com Vendor: Raytheon/BBN Technologies Release: RPSTIR 0.2 <http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpstir/> Protocol Role: Server 3. Protocol Data Units Does the implementation support Protocol Data Units (PDUs) as described in Section 5 of [RFC6810]? P0: Serial Notify P1: Serial Query P2: Reset Query P3: Cache Response P4: IPv4 Prefix P6: IPv6 Prefix P7: End of Data Bush, et al. Informational [Page 4]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 P8: Cache Reset P10: Error Report +---------+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+-----+------+-----+ | | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTR- | BBN | | | | | | .net | .net | | lib | | | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +---------+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+-----+------+-----+ | Rcv.P0 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P0 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P1 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Snd.P1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Rcv.P2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Snd.P2 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Rcv.P3 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P4 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P4 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P6 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P6 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P7 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P7 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P8 | YES | YES | YES | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.P8 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.P10 | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Snd.P10 | YES | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | +---------+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+-----+------+-----+ Note 1: No, Error PDU gets silently ignored. Bush, et al. Informational [Page 5]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 4. Protocol Sequence Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation follow the four protocol sequences as outlined in Section 6 of [RFC6810]? S1: Start or Restart S2: Typical Exchange S3: No Incremental Update Available S4: Cache Has No Data Available +----+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+------+--------+-------+ | | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | | .net | .net | | | | | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +----+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+------+--------+-------+ | S1 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | S2 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES | | S3 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | S4 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES~2 | +----+-----+-----+-------+--------+---------+------+--------+-------+ Note 1: Does not implement Serial Query, thus Incremental Update is never available, so responds to Serial Query with Cache Reset as described in Section 6.3 of [RFC6810] Note 2: Sends Cache Reset in response to Serial Query when no data; sends Error Report PDU in response to Reset Query when no data. Bush, et al. Informational [Page 6]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 5. Protocol Transport Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation support the different protocol transport mechanisms outlined in Section 7 of [RFC6810]? +---------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-----+--------+-----+ | | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | | .net | .net | | | | | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +---------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-----+--------+-----+ | SSH | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | | TLS | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | | TCP | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | TCP-MD5 | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | | TCP-AO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | | IPsec | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | +---------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-----+--------+-----+ 6. Error Codes Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation support the different protocol error codes outlined in Section 10 of [RFC6810]? +-------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-------+--------+-----+ | | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki | rpki | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | | .net | .net | | | | | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +-------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-------+--------+-----+ | Rcv.0 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Snd.0 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Rcv.1 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Snd.1 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Rcv.2 | YES | YES | NO | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.3 | YES | YES | NO | YES | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Snd.3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES | --- | YES | | Rcv.4 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Snd.4 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Rcv.5 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Snd.5 | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | | Rcv.6 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES~1 | --- | YES | | Snd.6 | YES | YES | NO | NO | --- | --- | YES | --- | | Rcv.7 | --- | --- | --- | --- | YES | YES~1 | --- | YES | | Snd.7 | YES | YES | NO | NO | --- | --- | YES | --- | +-------+-----+-----+-------+-------+--------+-------+--------+-----+ Note 1: YES, but... fatal, so connection is dropped, but cache does not conclude it's inconsistent. Bush, et al. Informational [Page 7]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 7. Incremental Updates Support Does the RPKI Router implementation support Incremental Updates as defined in Section 4 of [RFC6810]? +-----+----+-------+-------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +-----+----+-------+-------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ | NO | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | +-----+----+-------+-------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ 8. Session ID Support Session ID is used to indicate that the cache server may have restarted and that the incremental restart may not be possible. Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation support the Session ID procedures outlined in Section 5.1 of [RFC6810]? +-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+ | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+ | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO~1 | YES | YES | +-----+-----+-------+------------+------------+------+--------+-----+ Note 1: NO, using random, but will FIX 9. Incremental Session Startup Support Does the RPKI Router protocol implementation support Incremental session startups with Serial Number and Session ID as defined in Section 5.3 of [RFC6810]? +-----+-----+-------+------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ | IOS | XR | JUNOS | rpki.net | rpki.net | NCC | RTRlib | BBN | | | | | clnt | srvr | | | | +-----+-----+-------+------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | +-----+-----+-------+------------+-------------+-----+--------+-----+ Bush, et al. Informational [Page 8]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 10. Interoperable Implementations List other implementations with which you have tested the interoperability of the RPKI Router implementation. 10.1. Cisco Implementation Cisco: The Cisco IOS and IOS-XR implementation should be interoperable with other vendor RPKI Router Protocol implementations. In particular, we have tested our interoperability with rpki.net's RPKI Router implementation. 10.2. Juniper Implementation Juniper: The Juniper Networks, Inc. JUNOS implementation should be interoperable with other vendor RPKI Router Protocol implementations. In particular, we have tested our interoperability with rpki.net's and NCC's RPKI Router Cache implementation. 10.3. rpki.net Implementation rpki.net: The rpki.net implementation should operate with other rpki- rtr implementations. In particular, we have tested our rpki-rtr server's interoperability with Cisco IOS, Cisco IOS-XR, and Juniper. 10.4. RIPE NCC Implementation RIPE NCC: The RIPE NCC validator has been tested by us with other rpki-rtr implementations. In particular, we have tested with RTRlib and CISCO IOS. We received positive feedback from close contacts who tested our validator with JUNOS and Quagga. 10.5. RTRlib Implementation RTRlib: The RTRlib has been tested by us with other rpki-rtr implementations. In particular, we have tested with rtr-origin from rpki.net and RIPE NCC Validator. 10.6. BBN RPSTIR Implementation BBN RPSTIR: We have not yet tested with any other implementations. 11. Security Considerations No new security issues are introduced to the RPKI Router protocol defined in [RFC6810]. Bush, et al. Informational [Page 9]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 12. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Andrew Chi, David Mandelberg, Fabian Holler, Forhad Ahmed, and Tim Bruijnzeels for their contributions to this document. 13. Normative References [RFC6810] Bush, R. and R. Austein, "The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to Router Protocol", RFC 6810, January 2013. Bush, et al. Informational [Page 10]
RFC 7128 RPKI Router Implementation Report February 2014 Authors' Addresses Randy Bush Internet Initiative Japan 5147 Crystal Springs Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110 US EMail: randy@psg.com Rob Austein Dragon Research Labs EMail: sra@hactrn.net Keyur Patel Cisco Systems 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134 US EMail: keyupate@cisco.com Hannes Gredler Juniper Networks, Inc. 1194 N. Mathilda Ave. Sunnyvale, California 94089 US EMail: hannes@juniper.net Matthias Waehlisch FU Berlin Takustr. 9 Berlin 14195 Germany EMail: waehlisch@ieee.org URI: http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl Bush, et al. Informational [Page 11]
mirror server hosted at Truenetwork, Russian Federation.