Network Working Group L. Coene
Request for Comments: 4166 Siemens
Category: Informational J. Pastor-Balbas
Ericsson
February 2006
Telephony Signalling Transport over
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Applicability Statement
Status of This Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This document describes the applicability of the several protocols
developed under the signalling transport framework. A description of
the main issues regarding the use of the Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP) and an explanation of each adaptation layer for
transport of telephony signalling information over IP infrastructure
are given.
Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 1]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................2 1.1. Scope ......................................................2 1.2. Terminology ................................................3 1.3. Contributors ...............................................3 2. SIGTRAN Architecture ............................................3 3. Issues for Transporting Telephony Signalling over SCTP ..........5 3.1. Congestion Control .........................................5 3.2. Detection of Failures ......................................6 3.2.1. Retransmission TimeOut (RTO) Calculation ............6 3.2.2. Heartbeat ...........................................7 3.2.3. Maximum Number of Retransmissions ...................7 3.3. Shorten End-to-End Message Delay ...........................7 3.4. Bundling Considerations ....................................7 3.5. Stream Usage ...............................................7 4. User Adaptation Layers ..........................................7 4.1. Access Signalling .........................................10 4.1.1. IUA (ISDN Q.921 User Adaptation) ...................10 4.1.2. V5UA (V5.2-User Adaptation) Layer ..................12 4.1.3. DUA (DPNSS/DASS User adaptation) Layer .............13 4.2. Network Signalling ........................................13 4.2.1. MTP lvl3 over IP ...................................14 4.2.2. M3UA (SS7 MTP3 User Adaptation) Layer ..............17 4.2.3. SUA (SS7 SCCP User Adaptation) Layer ...............18 5. Security Considerations ........................................20 6. Informative References .........................................20 1. Introduction This document is intended to describe how to transport telephony signalling protocols, used in classic telephony systems, over IP networks. As described in [RFC2719], the whole architecture is called SIGTRAN (Signalling Transport) and is composed of a transport protocol (SCTP) and several User Adaptation Layers (UALs). The transport protocol SCTP has been developed to fulfill the stringent requirements of telephony signalling networks [RFC3257]. The set of UALs has also been introduced to make it possible for different signalling protocols to use the SCTP layer. 1.1. Scope The scope of this document is the SIGTRAN user adaptation layers and SCTP protocols and how they are used to transport telephony signalling information over IP networks. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 2]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 1.2. Terminology The following terms are commonly identified in related work: Association: SCTP connection between two endpoints. Stream: A uni-directional logical channel established within an association, within which all user messages are delivered in sequence except for those submitted to the unordered delivery service. SPU: Signalling protocol user, the application on top of the User adaptation layer. CTSP: Classical Telephony Signalling Protocol (examples include: MTP level 2, MTP level 3, and SCCP). UAL: User Adaptation Layer, the protocol that encapsulates the upper layer telephony signalling protocols that are to be transported over SCTP/IP. ISEP: IP Signalling Endpoint, an IP node that implements SCTP and a User adaptation layer. SP: Signalling Point. 1.3. Contributors The following people contributed to the document: L. Coene (Editor), M. Tuexen, G. Verwimp, J. Loughney, R.R. Stewart, Qiaobing Xie, M. Holdrege, M.C. Belinchon, A. Jungmaier, J. Pastor, and L. Ong. 2. SIGTRAN Architecture The SIGTRAN architecture describes the transport of signalling information over IP infrastructure. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 3]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Telephony signalling transport over IP normally uses the following architecture: Telephony Signalling Protocol | +------------------------------------+ | User Adaptation Layers | +------------------------------------+ | +------------------------------------+ |Stream Control Transmission Protocol| | (SCTP) | +------------------------------------+ | Internet Protocol (IPv4/IPv6) Figure 1: Telephony SIGnalling TRANsport Protocol Stack The components of the protocol stack are: 1. Adaptation layers used when the telephony application needs to preserve an existing primitive interface (e.g., management indications or data operation primitives for a particular user/application protocol). 2. SCTP, specially configured to meet the telephony application performance requirements. 3. The standard Internet Protocol. The telephony signalling protocols to be transported can be: o [RFC3332] SS7 MTP3 users: SCCP, ISUP, TUP... o [RFC3331] SS7 MTP2 users: MTP3 o [RFC3868] SS7 SCCP users: RANAP, MAP(+TCAP), INAP(+TCAP)... o [RFC3057] ISDN Q.921 users: Q.931 o [RFC3807] V5.2 / DSS1 o .... The user adaptation layers (UALs) are a set of protocols that encapsulate a specific signalling protocol to be transported over SCTP. The adaption is done in a way that the upper signalling protocols, which are relayed, remain unaware that the lower layers are different from the original lower telephony signalling layers. In that sense, the upper interface of the user adaptation layers needs to be the same as the upper layer interface is to its original lower layer. If a MTP user is being relayed over the IP network, the related UAL used to transport the MTP user will have the same upper interface as MTP has. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 4]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 The Stream Control Transmission Protocol was designed to fulfill the stringent transport requirements that classical signalling protocols have and is therefore the recommended transport protocol to use for this purpose. SCTP provides the following functions: o Reliable Data Transfer o Multiple streams to help avoid head-of-line blocking o Ordered and unordered data delivery on a per-stream basis o Bundling and fragmentation of user data o Congestion and flow control o Support for continuous monitoring of reachability o Graceful termination of association o Support of multi-homing for added reliability o Protection against blind denial-of-service attacks o Protection against blind masquerade attacks SCTP is used as the transport protocol for telephony signalling applications. Message boundaries are preserved during data transport by SCTP, so each UAL can specify its own message structure within the SCTP user data. The SCTP user data can be delivered by the order of transmission within a stream (in sequence delivery) or unordered. SCTP can be used to provide redundancy at the transport layer and below. Telephony applications needing this level of redundancy can make use of SCTP's multi-homing support. SCTP can be used for telephony applications where head-of-line blocking is a concern. Such an application should use multiple streams to provide independent ordering of telephony signalling messages. 3. Issues for Transporting Telephony Signalling over SCTP Transport of telephony signalling requires special considerations. In order to use SCTP, an implementation must take special care to meet the performance, timing, and failure management requirements. 3.1. Congestion Control The basic mechanism of congestion control in SCTP has been described in [RFC2960]. SCTP congestion control sometimes conflicts with the timing requirements of telephony signalling application messages which are transported by SCTP. During congestion, messages may be delayed by SCTP, thus sometimes violating the timing requirements of those telephony applications. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 5]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 In an engineered network (e.g., a private intranet), in which network capacity and maximum traffic are very well controlled, some telephony signalling applications may choose to relax the congestion control rules of SCTP in order to satisfy the timing requirements. In order to do this, they should employ their own congestion control mechanisms. This must be done without destabilizing the network; otherwise, it would lead to potential congestion collapse of the network. Some telephony signalling applications may have their own congestion control and flow control techniques. These techniques may interact with the congestion control procedures in SCTP. 3.2. Detection of Failures Often, telephony systems must have no single point of failure in operation. The UAL must meet certain service availability and performance requirements according to the classical signalling layers they are replacing. Those requirements may be specific for each UAL. For example, telephony systems are often required to be able to preserve stable calls during a component failure. Therefore, error situations at the transport layer and below must be detected quickly so that the UAL can take appropriate steps to recover and preserve the calls. This poses special requirements on SCTP to discover unreachability of a destination address or a peer. 3.2.1. Retransmission TimeOut (RTO) Calculation The SCTP protocol parameter RTO.Min value has a direct impact on the calculation of the RTO itself. Some telephony applications want to lower the value of the RTO.Min to less than 1 second. This would allow the message sender to reach the maximum number-of-retransmission threshold faster in the case of network failures. However, lowering RTO.Min may have a negative impact on network behaviour [ALLMAN99]. In some rare cases, telephony applications might not want to use the exponential timer back-off concept in RTO calculation in order to speed up failure detection. The danger of doing this is that, when network congestion occurs, not backing off the timer may worsen the congestion situation. Therefore, this strategy should never be used on the public Internet. It should be noted that not using delayed SACK will also increase the speed of failure detection. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 6]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 3.2.2. Heartbeat For faster detection of (un)availability of idle paths, the telephony application may consider lowering the SCTP parameter HB.interval. It should be noted this might result in a higher traffic load. 3.2.3. Maximum Number of Retransmissions Setting Path.Max.Retrans and Association.Max.Retrans SCTP parameters to lower values will speed up both destination address and peer failure detection. However, if these values are set too low, the probability of false fault detections might increase. 3.3. Shorten End-to-End Message Delay Telephony applications often require short end-to-end message delays. The method described in Section 3.2.1 for lowering RTO may be considered. The different paths within a single association will have a different RTO, so using the path with the lowest RTO will lead to a shorter end-to-end message delay for the application running on top of the UALs. 3.4. Bundling Considerations Bundling small telephony signalling messages at transmission helps improve the bandwidth usage efficiency of the network. On the downside, bundling may introduce additional delay to some of the messages. This should be taken into consideration when end-to-end delay is a concern. 3.5. Stream Usage Telephony signalling traffic is often composed of multiple, independent message sequences. It is highly desirable to transfer those independent message sequences in separate SCTP streams. This reduces the probability of head-of-line blocking in which the retransmission of a lost message affects the delivery of other messages not belonging to the same message sequence. 4. User Adaptation Layers Users Adaptation Layers (UALs) are defined to encapsulate different signalling protocols for transport over SCTP/IP. There are UALs for both access signalling (DSS1) and trunk signalling (SS7). A brief description of the standardized UALs follows in the next sub-sections. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 7]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 The delivery mechanism in several UALs supports: o Seamless operation of UALs user peers over an IP network connection. o The interface boundary that the UAL user had with the traditional lower layer. o Management of SCTP transport associations and traffic between SGs and ISEPs or two ISEPs o Asynchronous reporting of status changes to management. Signalling User Adaptation Layers have been developed for both Access and Trunk Telephony Signalling. They are defined as follows. Access Signalling: This is the signalling that is needed between an access device and an exchange in the core network in order to establish, manage, or release the voice or data call paths. Several protocols have been developed for this purpose. Trunk Signalling: This is the signalling that is used between the exchanges inside the core network in order to establish, manage, or release the voice or data call paths. The most common protocols used for this purpose are known as the SS7 system, which belongs to the Common Channel Signalling (CCS) philosophy. The SS7 protocol stack is depicted below: +------+-----+-------+- -+-------+------+-----+------+ | | | | | | MAP | CAP | INAP | + | + RANAP |...| BSSAP +-------------------+ | ISUP | TUP | | | | TCAP | + | +---------------------------------------+ | | | SCCP | +----------------------------------------------------+ | MTP3 | +----------------------------------------------------+ | MTP2 | +----------------------------------------------------+ | MTP1 | +----------------------------------------------------+ Figure 2: SS7 Protocol Stack Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 8]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 The Telephony Signalling Protocols to be transported with the already designed UALS are: o ISDN Q.921 Users: Q.931 o V5.2/DSS1 o DPNSS/DASS2 [RFC4129] o SS7 MTP3 Users: SCCP, ISUP, TUP o SS7 MTP2 Users: MTP3 o SS7 SCCP Users: TCAP, RANAP, BSSAP, ... Two main scenarios have been developed to use the different UALS for IP Signalling Transport: 1. Intercommunication of traditional Signalling transport nodes and IP based nodes. Traditional Telephony Telephony Signalling ********* Signalling ********** over IP ******** * SEP *----------------* SG *--------------* ISEP * ********* ********** ******** +-------+ +-------+ |SigProt| |SigProt| +-------+ +----+----+ +-------+ | | | |UAL | | UAL | | | | +----+ +-------+ | TTST | |TTST|SCTP| | SCTP | | | | +----+ +-------+ | | | | IP | | IP | +-------+ +---------+ +-------+ SEP - Signalling Endpoint SG - Signalling Gateway ISEP - IP Signalling Endpoint SigProt - Signalling Protocol TTSP - Traditional Telephony Signalling Protocol UAL - User Adaptation Layer SCTP - Stream Control Transport Protocol Figure 3: General Architecture of SS7-IP Interworking This is also referred to as SG-to-AS communication. AS is the name that UAL usually gives to the ISEP nodes. It stands for Application Server. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 9]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 2. Communication inside the IP network. Telephony Signalling ********* over IP ********* * ISEP *------------------* ISEP * ********* ********* +-------+ +-------+ |SigProt| |SigProt| +-------+ +-------+ | UAL | | UAL | +-------+ +-------+ | SCTP | | SCTP | +-------+ +-------+ | IP | | IP | +-------+ +-------+ Figure 4: General Architecture of Intra-IP Communication This is also referred to as IPSP communication. IPSP stands for IP Signalling Point and describes the role that the UAL plays on an IP-based node. The first scenario is applied for both types of signalling (access and trunk signalling). On the other hand, the peer-to-peer basis can only be used for trunk signalling. 4.1. Access Signalling The SIGTRAN WG has developed UALs to transport the following Access Signalling protocols: o ISDN Q.931 o V5.2 o DPNSS/DASS2 4.1.1. IUA (ISDN Q.921 User Adaptation) UAL: IUA (ISDN Q.921 User Adaptation) This document supports both ISDN Primary Rate Access (PRA) as well as Basic Rate Access (BRA) including the support for both point-to-point and point-to-multipoint modes of communication. This support includes Facility Associated Signalling (FAS), Non-Facility Associated Signalling (NFAS), and NFAS with backup D channel. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 10]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 It implements the client/server architecture. The default orientation is for the SG to take on the role of server while the ISEP is the client. The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for IUA is 9900. Examples of the upper layers to be transported are Q.931 and QSIG. The main scenario supported by this UAL is the SG-to-ISP communication where the ISEP role is typically played by a node called an MGC, as defined in [RFC2719]. ****** ISDN ****** IP ******* *PBX *---------------* SG *--------------* MGC * ****** ****** ******* +-----+ +-----+ |Q.931| (NIF) |Q.931| +-----+ +----------+ +-----+ | | | | IUA| | IUA | | | | +----+ +-----+ |Q.921| |Q.921|SCTP| |SCTP | | | | +----+ +-----+ | | | | IP | | IP | +-----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ NIF - Nodal Interworking Function PBX - Private Branch Exchange SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol IUA - ISDN User Adaptation Layer Protocol Figure 5: ISDN-IP Interworking using IUA The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for IUA is 9900. The value assigned by IANA for the Payload Protocol Identifier in the SCTP Payload Data chunk is "1". Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 11]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 4.1.2. V5UA (V5.2-User Adaptation) Layer UAL: V5UA (V5.2-User Adaptation) V5UA is an extension from the IUA layer with the modifications needed to support the differences between Q.921/Q.931, and V5.2 layer 2/layer 3. It supports analog telephone access, ISDN basic rate access and ISDN primary rate access over a V5.2 interface. It is typically implemented in an interworking scenario with SG. ****** V5.2 ****** IP ******* * AN *---------------* SG *--------------* MGC * ****** ****** ******* +-----+ +-----+ |V5.2 | (NIF) |V5.2 | +-----+ +----------+ +-----+ | | | |V5UA| |V5UA | | | | +----+ +-----+ |LAPV5| |LAPV5|SCTP| |SCTP | | | | +----+ +-----+ | | | | IP + | IP | +-----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ AN - Access Network NIF - Nodal Interworking Function LAPV5 - Link Access Protocol for the V5 channel SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol Figure 6: V5.2-IP Interworking using V5UA The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for V5UA is 5675. The value assigned by IANA for the Payload Protocol Identifier in the SCTP Payload Data chunk is "6". Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 12]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 4.1.3. DUA (DPNSS/DASS User adaptation) Layer UAL: DUA (DPNSS/DASS2 User Adaptation) The DUA is built on top of IUA and defines the necessary extensions to IUA for a DPNSS/DASS2 transport. DPNSS stands for Digital Private Network Signalling System and DASS2 for Digital Access Signalling System 2. ****** DPNSS ****** IP ******* *PBX *---------------* SG *--------------* MGC * ****** ****** ******* +-----+ +-----+ |DPNSS| (NIF) |DPNSS| | L3 | | L3 | +-----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ | | | | DUA| | DUA | |DPNSS| |DPNSS+----+ +-----+ | L2 | | L2 |SCTP| |SCTP | | | | +----+ +-----+ | | | | IP + | IP | +-----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ PBX - Private Branch eXchange NIF - Nodal Interworking Function SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol DUA - DPNSS User Adaptation Layer Protocol Figure 7: DPNSS-IP Interworking using DUA The value assigned by IANA for the Payload Protocol Identifier in the SCTP Payload Data chunk is "10". . 4.2. Network Signalling The SIGTRAN WG has developed UALs to transport the following SS7 protocols: o MTP2 Users: MTP3 o MTP3 Users: ISUP, TUP, SCCP o SCCP Users: TCAP, RNSAP, RANAP, BSSAP, ... Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 13]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 4.2.1. MTP lvl3 over IP UALs: o M2UA (SS7 MTP2 User Adaptation [RFC3331]) o M2PA (SS7 MTP2-User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation [RFC4165]) 4.2.1.1. M2UA (SS7 MTP2-User Adaptation) Layer M2UA protocol is typically used between a Signalling Gateway (SG) and Media Gateway Controller (MGC). The SG will terminate up to MTP Level 2, and the MGC will terminate MTP Level 3 and above. In other words, the SG will transport MTP Level 3 messages over an IP network to an MGC. MTP3 and MTP3b are the only SS7 MTP2 User protocols that are transported by this UAL. The SG provides an interworking of transport functions with the IP transport to transfer MTP2-User signalling messages with an Application Server (e.g., MGC) where the peer MTP2-User exists. ****** SS7 ****** IP ******* *SEP *-----------* SG *-------------* MGC * ****** ****** ******* +----+ +----+ |S7UP| |S7UP| +----+ +----+ |MTP3| |MTP3| | | (NIF) | | +----+ +----+----+ +----+ | | | |M2UA| |M2UA| | | | +----+ +----+ |MTP2| |MTP2|SCTP| |SCTP| | | | +----+ +----+ | | | |IP | |IP | +----+ +---------+ +----+ MGC - Media Gateway Controller SG - Signalling Gateway SEP - SS7 Signalling Endpoint NIF - Nodal Interworking Function IP - Internet Protocol SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol Figure 8: SS7-IP Interworking using M2UA Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 14]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for M2UA is 2904. The value assigned by IANA for the Payload Protocol Identifier in the SCTP Payload Data chunk is "2". 4.2.1.2. M2PA (SS7 MTP2-User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation) M2PA protocol is used between SS7 Signalling Points employing the MTP Level 3 protocol. The SS7 Signalling Points may also use standard SS7 links using the SS7 MTP Level 2 to provide transport of MTP Level 3 signalling messages. Both configurations: communication of SS7 and IP with SG and communication between ISEPs are possible. Connection of SS7 and IP nodes: ******** SS7 *************** IP ******** * SEP *--------* SG *--------* IPSP * ******** *************** ******** +------+ +------+ | TCAP | | TCAP | +------+ +------+ | SCCP | | SCCP | +------+ +-------------+ +------+ | MTP3 | | MTP3 | | MTP3 | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ | | | | M2PA | | M2PA | | | | +------+ +------+ | MTP2 | | MTP2 | SCTP | | SCTP | | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ SEP - SS7 Signalling Endpoint Figure 9: SS7-IP Interworking with M2PA Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 15]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Communication between two IP nodes: ******** IP ******** * IPSP *--------* IPSP * ******** ******** +------+ +------+ | TCAP | | TCAP | +------+ +------+ | SCCP | | SCCP | +------+ +------+ | MTP3 | | MTP3 | +------+ +------+ | M2PA | | M2PA | +------+ +------+ | SCTP | | SCTP | +------+ +------+ | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+ IP - Internet Protocol IPSP - IP Signalling Point SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol Figure 10: Intra-IP Communication using M2PA These figures are only an example. Other configurations are possible. For example, IPSPs without traditional SS7 links could use the protocol layers MTP3/M2PA/SCTP/IP to route SS7 messages in a network with all IP links. Another example is that two SGs could be connected over an IP network to form an SG mated pair, similar to the way STPs are provisioned in traditional SS7 networks. The SCTP (and UDP/TCP) Registered User Port Number Assignment for M2PA is 3565. The value assigned by IANA for the Payload Protocol Identifier in the SCTP Payload Data chunk is "5". Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 16]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 4.2.1.3. Main Differences between M2PA and M2UA o M2PA: IPSP processes MTP3/MTP2 primitives. o M2UA: MGC transports MTP3/MTP2 primitives between the SG's MTP2 and the MGC's MTP3 (via the NIF) for processing. o M2PA: SG-IPSP connection is an SS7 link. o M2UA: SG-MGC connection is not an SS7 link. It is an extension of MTP to a remote entity. 4.2.2. M3UA (SS7 MTP3 User Adaptation) Layer UAL: M3UA (SS7 MTP3 User Adaptation) M3UA protocol supports the transport of any SS7 MTP3-User signalling such as TUP, ISUP, and SCCP over IP using the services of SCTP. Interconnection of SS7 and IP nodes: ******** SS7 ***************** IP ******** * SEP *---------* SGP *--------* ASP * ******** ***************** ******** +------+ +---------------+ +------+ | ISUP | | (NIF) | | ISUP | +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+ | MTP3 | | MTP3 | | M3UA | | M3UA | +------| +------+-+------+ +------+ | MTP2 | | MTP2 | | SCTP | | SCTP | +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+ | L1 | | L1 | | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+ +------+ +------+ SEP - SS7 Signalling End Point SCTP - Stream Control Transmission Protocol NIF - Nodal Interworking Function Figure 11: SS7-IP Interworking using M3UA Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 17]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Communication between two IP nodes: ******** IP ******** * IPSP *----------* IPSP * ******** ******** +------+ +------+ |SCCP- | |SCCP- | | User | | User | +------+ +------+ | SCCP | | SCCP | +------+ +------+ | M3UA | | M3UA | +------+ +------+ | SCTP | | SCTP | +------+ +------+ | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+ Figure 12: Intra-IP Communication using M3UA M3UA uses a client-server architecture. It is recommended that the ISEP acts as the client and initiate the SCTP associations with the SG. The port reserved by IANA is 2905. This is the port upon which the SG should listen for possible client connections. The assigned payload protocol identifier for the SCTP DATA chunks is "3". 4.2.3. SUA (SS7 SCCP User Adaptation) Layer UAL: SUA (SS7 SCCP User Adaptation) SUA protocol supports the transport of any SS7 SCCP-User signalling such as MAP, INAP, SMS, BSSAP, or RANAP over IP using the services of SCTP. Each of the applications using SUA has its own set of timing requirements that can be found in its respective standards documents. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 18]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Possible configurations are showed in the pictures below. - Interconnection of SS7 and IP: ******** *************** ******** * SEP * SS7 * * IP * * * or *---------* SG *--------* ASP * * STP * * * * * ******** *************** ******** +------ +------+ | SUAP | | SUAP | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ | SCCP | | SCCP | SUA | | SUA | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ | | | | | | | | MTP3 | | MTP3 | SCTP | | SCTP | | | | | | | | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ | MTP2 | | MTP2 | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+------+ +------+ SUAP - SCCP/SUA User Protocol (TCAP, for example) STP - SS7 Signalling Transfer Point Figure 13: SS7-IP Interworking using SUA - IP Node to IP Node communication: ******** ******** * * IP * * * IPSP *--------* IPSP * * * * * ******** ******** +------+ +------+ | SUAP | | SUAP | +------+ +------+ | SUA | | SUA | +------+ +------+ | SCTP | | SCTP | +------+ +------+ | IP | | IP | +------+ +------+ Figure 14: Intra-IP Communication using SUA Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 19]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 IANA has registered SCTP Port Number 14001 for SUA. It is recommended that SGs use this SCTP port number for listening for new connections. The payload protocol identifier for the SCTP DATA chunks is "4". 5. Security Considerations UALs are designated to carry signalling messages for telephony services. As such, UALs must involve the security needs of several parties: the end users of the services, the network providers, and the applications involved. Additional requirements may come from local regulation. Although some security needs overlap, any security solution should fulfill all the different parties' needs. See specific Security Considerations in each UAL Technical specification for details (for general security principles of SIGTRAN, see [RFC3788]). SCTP only tries to increase the availability of a network. SCTP does not contain any protocol mechanisms directly related to communication security, i.e., user message authentication, integrity, or confidentiality functions. For such features, SCTP depends on security protocols. In the field of system security, SCTP includes mechanisms for reducing the risk of blind denial-of-service attacks as described in Section 11 of [RFC2960]. This document does not add any new components to the protocols included in the discussion. For secure use of the SIGTRAN protocols, readers should go through the "Security Considerations for SIGTRAN Protocols" [RFC3788]). According to that document, the use of the IPsec is the main requirement to secure SIGTRAN protocols in the Internet, but Transport Layer Security (TLS) is also considered a perfectly valid option for use in certain scenarios (see [RFC3436] for more information on using TLS with SCTP). Recommendations of usage are also included. 6. Informative References [ALLMAN99] Allman, M. and V. Paxson, "On Estimating End-to-End Network Path Properties", Proc. SIGCOMM'99, 1999. [RFC2960] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Morneault, K., Sharp, C., Schwarzbauer, H., Taylor, T., Rytina, I., Kalla, M., Zhang, L., and V. Paxson, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 2960, October 2000. [RFC3257] Coene, L., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol Applicability Statement", RFC 3257, April 2002. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 20]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 [RFC2719] Ong, L., Rytina, I., Garcia, M., Schwarzbauer, H., Coene, L., Lin, H., Juhasz, I., Holdrege, M., and C. Sharp, "Framework Architecture for Signaling Transport", RFC 2719, October 1999. [RFC3057] Morneault, K., Rengasami, S., Kalla, M., and G. Sidebottom, "ISDN Q.921-User Adaptation Layer", RFC 3057, February 2001. [RFC3331] Morneault, K., Dantu, R., Sidebottom, G., Bidulock, B., and J. Heitz, "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 2 (MTP2) - User Adaptation Layer", RFC 3331, September 2002. [RFC3332] Sidebottom, G., Morneault, K., and J. Pastor-Balbas, "Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA)", RFC 3332, September 2002. [RFC3436] Jungmaier, A., Rescorla, E., and M. Tuexen, "Transport Layer Security over Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 3436, December 2002. [RFC3868] Loughney, J., Sidebottom, G., Coene, L., Verwimp, G., Keller, J., and B. Bidulock, "Signalling Connection Control Part User Adaptation Layer (SUA)", RFC 3868, October 2004. [RFC4165] George, T., Dantu, R., Kalla, M., Schwarzbauer, H.J., Sidebottom, G., Morneault, K.,"SS7 MTP2-User Peer-to-Peer Adaptation Layer", RFC 4165, September 2005. [RFC3807] Weilandt, E., Khanchandani, N., and S. Rao, "V5.2-User Adaptation Layer (V5UA)", RFC 3807, June 2004. [RFC4129] Mukundan, R., Morneault, K., and N. Mangalpally, "Digital Private Network Signaling System (DPNSS)/Digital Access Signaling System 2 (DASS 2) Extensions to the IUA Protocol", RFC 4129, September 2005. [RFC3788] Loughney, J., Tuexen, M., and J. Pastor-Balbas, "Security Considerations for Signaling Transport (SIGTRAN) Protocols", RFC 3788, June 2004. Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 21]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Authors' Addresses Lode Coene Siemens Atealaan 34 Herentals B-2200 Belgium Phone: +32-14-252081 EMail: lode.coene@siemens.com Javier Pastor-Balbas Ericsson Via de los Poblados 13 Madrid 28033 Spain Phone: +34 91 339 1397 EMail: J.Javier.Pastor@ericsson.com Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 22]
RFC 4166 Telephony Signalling over SCTP AS February 2006 Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA). Coene & Pastor-Balbas Informational [Page 23]
mirror server hosted at Truenetwork, Russian Federation.