Network Working Group A. Johnston
Request for Comments: 3665 MCI
BCP: 75 S. Donovan
Category: Best Current Practice R. Sparks
C. Cunningham
dynamicsoft
K. Summers
Sonus
December 2003
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Basic Call Flow Examples
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document gives examples of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
call flows. Elements in these call flows include SIP User Agents and
Clients, SIP Proxy and Redirect Servers. Scenarios include SIP
Registration and SIP session establishment. Call flow diagrams and
message details are shown.
Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 1]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Table of Contents 1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. General Assumptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Legend for Message Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3. SIP Protocol Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. SIP Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Successful New Registration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. Update of Contact List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3. Request for Current Contact List . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.4. Cancellation of Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.5. Unsuccessful Registration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3. SIP Session Establishment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.1. Successful Session Establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2. Session Establishment Through Two Proxies. . . . . . . . 15 3.3. Session with Multiple Proxy Authentication . . . . . . . 26 3.4. Successful Session with Proxy Failure. . . . . . . . . . 37 3.5. Session Through a SIP ALG. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.6. Session via Redirect and Proxy Servers with SDP in ACK . 54 3.7. Session with re-INVITE (IP Address Change) . . . . . . . 61 3.8. Unsuccessful No Answer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.9. Unsuccessful Busy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 3.10. Unsuccessful No Response from User Agent . . . . . . . . 80 3.11. Unsuccessful Temporarily Unavailable . . . . . . . . . . 85 4. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 6. Intellectual Property Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 7. Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 8. Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 9. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 1. Overview The call flows shown in this document were developed in the design of a SIP IP communications network. They represent an example minimum set of functionality. It is the hope of the authors that this document will be useful for SIP implementers, designers, and protocol researchers alike and will help further the goal of a standard implementation of RFC 3261 [1]. These flows represent carefully checked and working group reviewed scenarios of the most basic examples as a companion to the specifications. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 2]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 These call flows are based on the current version 2.0 of SIP in RFC 3261 [1] with SDP usage described in RFC 3264 [2]. Other RFCs also comprise the SIP standard but are not used in this set of basic call flows. Call flow examples of SIP interworking with the PSTN through gateways are contained in a companion document, RFC 3666 [5]. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [4]. 1.1. General Assumptions A number of architecture, network, and protocol assumptions underlie the call flows in this document. Note that these assumptions are not requirements. They are outlined in this section so that they may be taken into consideration and to aid in the understanding of the call flow examples. The authentication of SIP User Agents in these example call flows is performed using HTTP Digest as defined in [1] and [3]. Some Proxy Servers in these call flows insert Record-Route headers into requests to ensure that they are in the signaling path for future message exchanges. These flows show TCP, TLS, and UDP for transport. See the discussion in RFC 3261 for details on the transport issues for SIP. 1.2. Legend for Message Flows Dashed lines (---) represent signaling messages that are mandatory to the call scenario. These messages can be SIP or PSTN signaling. The arrow indicates the direction of message flow. Double dashed lines (===) represent media paths between network elements. Messages with parentheses around their name represent optional messages. Messages are identified in the Figures as F1, F2, etc. This references the message details in the list that follows the Figure. Comments in the message details are shown in the following form: /* Comments. */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 3]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 1.3. SIP Protocol Assumptions This document does not prescribe the flows precisely as they are shown, but rather the flows illustrate the principles for best practice. They are best practices usages (orderings, syntax, selection of features for the purpose, handling of error) of SIP methods, headers and parameters. IMPORTANT: The exact flows here must not be copied as is by an implementer due to specific incorrect characteristics that were introduced into the document for convenience and are listed below. To sum up, the basic flows represent well-reviewed examples of SIP usage, which are best common practice according to IETF consensus. For simplicity in reading and editing the document, there are a number of differences between some of the examples and actual SIP messages. For example, the HTTP Digest responses are not actual MD5 encodings. Call-IDs are often repeated, and CSeq counts often begin at 1. Header fields are usually shown in the same order. Usually only the minimum required header field set is shown, others that would normally be present such as Accept, Supported, Allow, etc are not shown. Actors: Element Display Name URI IP Address ------- ------------ --- ---------- User Agent Alice alice@atlanta.example.com 192.0.2.101 User Agent Bob bob@biloxi.example.com 192.0.2.201 User Agent bob@chicago.example.com 192.0.2.100 Proxy Server ss1.atlanta.example.com 192.0.2.111 Proxy/Registrar ss2.biloxi.example.com 192.0.2.222 Proxy Server ss3.chicago.example.com 192.0.2.233 ALG alg1.atlanta.example.com 192.0.2.128 2. SIP Registration Registration binds a particular device Contact URI with a SIP user Address of Record (AOR). Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 4]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 2.1. Successful New Registration Bob SIP Server | | | REGISTER F1 | |------------------------------>| | 401 Unauthorized F2 | |<------------------------------| | REGISTER F3 | |------------------------------>| | 200 OK F4 | |<------------------------------| | | Bob sends a SIP REGISTER request to the SIP server. The request includes the user's contact list. This flow shows the use of HTTP Digest for authentication using TLS transport. TLS transport is used due to the lack of integrity protection in HTTP Digest and the danger of registration hijacking without it, as described in RFC 3261 [1]. The SIP server provides a challenge to Bob. Bob enters her/his valid user ID and password. Bob's SIP client encrypts the user information according to the challenge issued by the SIP server and sends the response to the SIP server. The SIP server validates the user's credentials. It registers the user in its contact database and returns a response (200 OK) to Bob's SIP client. The response includes the user's current contact list in Contact headers. The format of the authentication shown is HTTP digest. It is assumed that Bob has not previously registered with this Server. Message Details F1 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 5]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F2 401 Unauthorized SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=1410948204 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="ea9c8e88df84f1cec4341ae6cbe5a359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 F3 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashd92 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=ja743ks76zlflH To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 2 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Authorization: Digest username="bob", realm="atlanta.example.com" nonce="ea9c8e88df84f1cec4341ae6cbe5a359", opaque="", uri="sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com", response="dfe56131d1958046689d83306477ecc" Content-Length: 0 F4 200 OK SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashd92 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=ja743ks76zlflH To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=37GkEhwl6 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 2 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 6]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 2.2. Update of Contact List Bob SIP Server | | | REGISTER F1 | |------------------------------>| | 200 OK F2 | |<------------------------------| | | Bob wishes to update the list of addresses where the SIP server will redirect or forward INVITE requests. Bob sends a SIP REGISTER request to the SIP server. Bob's request includes an updated contact list. Since the user already has authenticated with the server, the user supplies authentication credentials with the request and is not challenged by the server. The SIP server validates the user's credentials. It registers the user in its contact database, updates the user's contact list, and returns a response (200 OK) to Bob's SIP client. The response includes the user's current contact list in Contact headers. Message Details F1 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: mailto:bob@biloxi.example.com Authorization: Digest username="bob", realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="1cec4341ae6cbe5a359ea9c8e88df84f", opaque="", uri="sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com", response="71ba27c64bd01de719686aa4590d5824" Content-Length: 0 F2 200 OK SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=34095828jh Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 7]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com>;expires=3600 Contact: <mailto:bob@biloxi.example.com>;expires=4294967295 Content-Length: 0 2.3. Request for Current Contact List Bob SIP Server | | | REGISTER F1 | |------------------------------>| | 200 OK F2 | |<------------------------------| | | Bob sends a register request to the Proxy Server containing no Contact headers, indicating the user wishes to query the server for the user's current contact list. Since the user already has authenticated with the server, the user supplies authentication credentials with the request and is not challenged by the server. The SIP server validates the user's credentials. The server returns a response (200 OK) which includes the user's current registration list in Contact headers. Message Details F1 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Authorization: Digest username="bob", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="df84f1cec4341ae6cbe5ap359a9c8e88", opaque="", uri="sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com", response="aa7ab4678258377c6f7d4be6087e2f60" Content-Length: 0 F2 200 OK SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 8]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=jqoiweu75 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com>;expires=3600 Contact: <mailto:bob@biloxi.example.com>;expires=4294967295 Content-Length: 0 2.4. Cancellation of Registration Bob SIP Server | | | REGISTER F1 | |------------------------------>| | 200 OK F2 | |<------------------------------| | | Bob wishes to cancel their registration with the SIP server. Bob sends a SIP REGISTER request to the SIP server. The request has an expiration period of 0 and applies to all existing contact locations. Since the user already has authenticated with the server, the user supplies authentication credentials with the request and is not challenged by the server. The SIP server validates the user's credentials. It clears the user's contact list, and returns a response (200 OK) to Bob's SIP client. Message Details F1 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Expires: 0 Contact: * Authorization: Digest username="bob", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="88df84f1cac4341aea9c8ee6cbe5a359", opaque="", uri="sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com", response="ff0437c51696f9a76244f0cf1dbabbea" Content-Length: 0 F2 200 OK SIP Server -> Bob Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 9]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=1418nmdsrf Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Content-Length: 0 2.5. Unsuccessful Registration Bob SIP Server | | | REGISTER F1 | |------------------------------>| | 401 Unauthorized F2 | |<------------------------------| | REGISTER F3 | |------------------------------>| | 401 Unauthorized F4 | |<------------------------------| | | Bob sends a SIP REGISTER request to the SIP Server. The SIP server provides a challenge to Bob. Bob enters her/his user ID and password. Bob's SIP client encrypts the user information according to the challenge issued by the SIP server and sends the response to the SIP server. The SIP server attempts to validate the user's credentials, but they are not valid (the user's password does not match the password established for the user's account). The server returns a response (401 Unauthorized) to Bob's SIP client. Message Details F1 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 10]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F2 Unauthorized SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=a73kszlfl To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=1410948204 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 1 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="f1cec4341ae6ca9c8e88df84be55a359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 F3 REGISTER Bob -> SIP Server REGISTER sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashd92 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=JueHGuidj28dfga To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 2 REGISTER Contact: <sips:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Authorization: Digest username="bob", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="f1cec4341ae6ca9c8e88df84be55a359", opaque="", uri="sips:ss2.biloxi.example.com", response="61f8470ceb87d7ebf508220214ed438b" Content-Length: 0 /* The response above encodes the incorrect password */ F4 401 Unauthorized SIP Server -> Bob SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/TLS client.biloxi.example.com:5061;branch=z9hG4bKnashd92 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=JueHGuidj28dfga To: Bob <sips:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=1410948204 Call-ID: 1j9FpLxk3uxtm8tn@biloxi.example.com CSeq: 2 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="84f1c1ae6cbe5ua9c8e88dfa3ecm3459", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 11]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3. SIP Session Establishment This section details session establishment between two SIP User Agents (UAs): Alice and Bob. Alice (sip:alice@atlanta.example.com) and Bob (sip:bob@biloxi.example.com) are assumed to be SIP phones or SIP-enabled devices. The successful calls show the initial signaling, the exchange of media information in the form of SDP payloads, the establishment of the media session, then finally the termination of the call. HTTP Digest authentication is used by Proxy Servers to authenticate the caller Alice. It is assumed that Bob has registered with Proxy Server Proxy 2 as per Section 2 to be able to receive the calls via the Proxy. 3.1. Successful Session Establishment Alice Bob | | | INVITE F1 | |----------------------->| | 180 Ringing F2 | |<-----------------------| | | | 200 OK F3 | |<-----------------------| | ACK F4 | |----------------------->| | Both Way RTP Media | |<======================>| | | | BYE F5 | |<-----------------------| | 200 OK F6 | |----------------------->| | | In this scenario, Alice completes a call to Bob directly. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 12]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F2 180 Ringing Bob -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=8321234356 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 F3 200 OK Bob -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=8321234356 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 13]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F4 ACK Alice -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bd5 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=8321234356 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and Bob */ /* Bob Hangs Up with Alice. Note that the CSeq is NOT 2, since Alice and Bob maintain their own independent CSeq counts. (The INVITE was request 1 generated by Alice, and the BYE is request 1 generated by Bob) */ F5 BYE Bob -> Alice BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=8321234356 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F6 200 OK Alice -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=8321234356 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 14]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.2. Session Establishment Through Two Proxies Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| | | | 407 F2 | | | |<---------------| | | | ACK F3 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F4 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F5 | | | 100 F6 |--------------->| INVITE F7 | |<---------------| 100 F8 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | | 180 F9 | | | 180 F10 |<---------------| | 180 F11 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | 200 F12 | | | 200 F13 |<---------------| | 200 F14 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F15 | | | |--------------->| ACK F16 | | | |--------------->| ACK F17 | | | |--------------->| | Both Way RTP Media | |<================================================>| | | | BYE F18 | | | BYE F19 |<---------------| | BYE F20 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | | 200 F21 | | | |--------------->| 200 F22 | | | |--------------->| 200 F23 | | | |--------------->| | | | | In this scenario, Alice completes a call to Bob using two proxies Proxy 1 and Proxy 2. The initial INVITE (F1) contains a pre-loaded Route header with the address of Proxy 1 (Proxy 1 is configured as a default outbound proxy for Alice). The request does not contain the Authorization credentials Proxy 1 requires, so a 407 Proxy Authorization response is sent containing the challenge information. A new INVITE (F4) is then sent containing the correct credentials and the call proceeds. The call terminates when Bob disconnects by initiating a BYE message. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 15]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Proxy 1 inserts a Record-Route header into the INVITE message to ensure that it is present in all subsequent message exchanges. Proxy 2 also inserts itself into the Record-Route header. The ACK (F15) and BYE (F18) both have a Route header. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b43 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 1 challenges Alice for authentication */ F2 407 Proxy Authorization Required Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authorization Required Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b43 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=3flal12sf Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="f84f1cec41e6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 16]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F3 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b43 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=3flal12sf Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* Alice responds be re-sending the INVITE with authentication credentials in it. */ F4 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="wf84f1ceczx41ae6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="42ce3cef44b22f50c6a6071bc8" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 1 accepts the credentials and forwards the INVITE to Proxy 2. Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network. */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 17]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F5 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F6 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F7 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 18]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F8 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F9 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 19]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F10 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F11 180 Ringing Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F12 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 20]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F13 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F14 200 OK Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 21]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F15 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b76 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 F16 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b76 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 F17 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 22]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b76 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and Bob */ /* Bob Hangs Up with Alice. */ /* Again, note that the CSeq is NOT 3. Alice and Bob maintain their own separate CSeq counts */ F18 BYE Bob -> Proxy 2 BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F19 BYE Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 Max-Forwards: 69 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 23]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F20 BYE Proxy 1 -> Alice BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 Max-Forwards: 68 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F21 200 OK Alice -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F22 200 OK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 24]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F23 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 25]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.3. Session with Multiple Proxy Authentication Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |----------->| | | | 407 Proxy Authorization Required F2 | |<-----------| | | | ACK F3 | | | |----------->| | | | INVITE F4 | | | |----------->| | | | 100 F5 | | | |<-----------| INVITE F6 | | | |---------->| | | | 407 Proxy Authorization Required F7 | |<----------| | | | ACK F8 | | | |---------->| | | 407 Proxy Authorization Required F9 | |<-----------| | | | ACK F10 | | | |----------->| | | | INVITE F11| | | |----------->| | | | 100 F12 | | | |<-----------| INVITE F13| | | |---------->| | | | 100 F14 | | | |<----------| INVITE F15 | | | |------------>| | | | 200 OK F16 | | | 200 OK F17|<------------| | 200 OK F18 |<----------| | |<-----------| | | | ACK F19 | | | |----------->| ACK F20 | | | |---------->| ACK F21 | | | |------------>| | RTP Media Path | |<====================================>| In this scenario, Alice completes a call to Bob using two proxies Proxy 1 and Proxy 2. Alice has valid credentials in both domains. Since the initial INVITE (F1) does not contain the Authorization credentials Proxy 1 requires, so a 407 Proxy Authorization response is sent containing the challenge information. A new INVITE (F4) is Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 26]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 then sent containing the correct credentials and the call proceeds after Proxy 2 challenges and receives valid credentials. The call terminates when Bob disconnects by initiating a BYE message. Proxy 1 inserts a Record-Route header into the INVITE message to ensure that it is present in all subsequent message exchanges. Proxy 2 also inserts itself into the Record-Route header. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b03 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 1 challenges Alice for authentication */ F2 407 Proxy Authorization Required Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authorization Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b03 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=876321 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="atlanta.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="wf84f1cczx41ae6cbeaea9ce88d359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 27]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F3 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 70 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b03 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=876321 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* Alice responds be re-sending the INVITE with authentication credentials in it. The same Call-ID is used, so the CSeq is increased. */ F4 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="wf84f1ceczx41ae6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="42ce3cef44b22f50c6a6071bc8" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 1 accepts the credentials and forwards the INVITE to Proxy 2. Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network. */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 28]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F5 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F6 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 2 challenges Alice for authentication */ F7 407 Proxy Authorization Required Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authorization Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 ;received=192.0.2.101 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 29]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=838209 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="biloxi.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 F8 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=838209 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* Proxy 1 forwards the challenge to Alice for authentication from Proxy 2 */ F9 407 Proxy Authorization Required Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authorization Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=838209 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="biloxi.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 F10 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b21 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=838209 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 30]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 CSeq: 2 ACK Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="wf84f1ceczx41ae6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="42ce3cef44b22f50c6a6071bc8" Content-Length: 0 /* Alice responds be re-sending the INVITE with authentication credentials for Proxy 1 AND Proxy 2. */ F11 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="wf84f1ceczx41ae6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="42ce3cef44b22f50c6a6071bc8" Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="f44ab22f150c6a56071bce8" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 1 finds its credentials and authorizes Alice, forwarding the INVITE to Proxy. */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 31]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F12 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F13 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="f44ab22f150c6a56071bce8" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 2 finds its credentials and authorizes Alice, forwarding the INVITE to Bob. */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 32]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F14 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F15 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK31972.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Bob answers the call immediately */ Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 33]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F16 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK31972.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F17 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 34]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F18 200 OK Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F19 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b44 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 ACK Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="wf84f1ceczx41ae6cbe5aea9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="42ce3cef44b22f50c6a6071bc8" Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 35]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="f44ab22f150c6a56071bce8" Content-Length: 0 F20 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b44 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 ACK Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", nonce="c1e22c41ae6cbe5ae983a9c8e88d359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="f44ab22f150c6a56071bce8" Content-Length: 0 F21 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK31972.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK230f2.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b44 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=9103874 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 3 ACK Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 36]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.4. Successful Session with Proxy Failure Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F2 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F3 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F4 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F5 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F6 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F7 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F8 | | |-------------------------------->| | | 407 F9 | | |<--------------------------------| | | ACK F10 | | |-------------------------------->| | | INVITE F11 | | |-------------------------------->| INVITE F12 | | 100 F13 |--------------->| |<--------------------------------| | | | 180 F14 | | 180 F15 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | | 200 F16 | | 200 F17 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | ACK F18 | | |-------------------------------->| ACK F19 | | |--------------->| | Both Way RTP Media | |<================================================>| | | BYE F20 | | BYE F21 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | 200 F22 | | |-------------------------------->| 200 F23 | | |--------------->| | | | Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 37]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 In this scenario, Alice completes a call to Bob via a Proxy Server. Alice is configured for a primary SIP Proxy Server Proxy 1 and a secondary SIP Proxy Server Proxy 2 (Or is able to use DNS SRV records to locate Proxy 1 and Proxy 2). Alice has valid credentials for both domains. Proxy 1 is out of service and does not respond to INVITEs (it is reachable, but unresponsive). Alice then completes the call to Bob using Proxy 2. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK465b6d Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F2 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 F3 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 F4 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 38]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F5 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 F6 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 F7 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 Same as Message F1 /* Alice gives up on the unresponsive proxy */ F8 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b8a Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Proxy 2 challenges Alice for authentication */ F9 407 Proxy Authorization Required Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authorization Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b8a ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=2421452 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 39]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="biloxi.example.com", qop="auth", nonce="1ae6cbe5ea9c8e8df84fqnlec434a359", opaque="", stale=FALSE, algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 F10 ACK Alice -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b8a Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=2421452 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* Alice responds by re-sending the INVITE with authentication credentials in it. */ F11 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", nonce="1ae6cbe5ea9c8e8df84fqnlec434a359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="8a880c919d1a52f20a1593e228adf599" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 40]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 /* Proxy 2 accepts the credentials and forwards the INVITE to Bob. Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network. */ F12 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F13 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F14 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 41]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F15 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F16 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 42]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F17 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F18 ACK Alice -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b8g Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 F19 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b8g ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 43]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and Bob */ /* Bob Hangs Up with Alice. */ F20 BYE Bob -> Proxy 2 BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr> From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F21 BYE Proxy 2 -> Alice BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F22 200 OK Alice -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 44]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F23 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 ;received=192.0.2.201 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 4Fde34wkd11wsGFDs3@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 45]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.5. Session Through a SIP ALG Alice ALG Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F2 | | | 100 F3 |--------------->| INVITE F4 | |<---------------| 100 F5 |--------------->| | |<---------------| 180 F6 | | | 180 F7 |<---------------| | 180 F8 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | 200 F9 | | | 200 F10 |<---------------| | 200 F11 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | ACK F12 | | |--------------->| ACK F13 | | |-------------------------------->| | RTP Media | Both Way RTP Media | |<==============>|<===============================>| | BYE F14 | | |--------------->| BYE F15 | | |-------------------------------->| | | 200 F16 | | 200 F17 |<--------------------------------| |<---------------| | | | | Alice completes a call to Bob through a ALG (Application Layer Gateway) and a SIP Proxy. The routing through the ALG is accomplished using a pre-loaded Route header in the INVITE F1. Note that the media stream setup is not end-to-end - the ALG terminates both media streams and bridges them. This is done by the ALG modifying the SDP in the INVITE (F1) and 200 OK (F10) messages, and possibly any 18x or ACK messages containing SDP. In addition to firewall traversal, this Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA) could be used as part of an anonymizer service (in which all identifying information on Alice would be removed), or to perform codec media conversion, such as mu-law to A-law conversion of PCM on an international call. Also note that Proxy 2 does not Record-Route in this call flow. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 46]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> SIP ALG INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", nonce="85b4f1cen4341ae6cbe5a3a9c8e88df9", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="b3f392f9218a328b9294076d708e6815" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network. */ F2 INVITE SIP ALG -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="biloxi.example.com", Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 47]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 nonce="85b4f1cen4341ae6cbe5a3a9c8e88df9", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="b3f392f9218a328b9294076d708e6815" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 150 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.128 t=0 0 m=audio 2000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F3 100 Trying SIP ALG -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 /* SIP ALG prepares to proxy data from port 192.0.2.128/2000 to 192.0.2.101/49172. Proxy 2 uses a Location Service function to determine where Bob is located. Based upon location analysis the call is forwarded to Bob */ F4 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 48]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Content-Length: 150 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.128 t=0 0 m=audio 2000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F5 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> SIP ALG SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F6 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F7 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> SIP ALG SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 49]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F8 180 Ringing SIP ALG -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F9 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 50]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F10 200 OK Proxy 2 -> SIP ALG SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F11 200 OK SIP ALG -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.128 t=0 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 51]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 m=audio 1734 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* The ALG prepares to proxy packets from 192.0.2.128/ 1734 to 192.0.2.201/3456 */ F12 ACK Alice -> SIP ALG ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bhh Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F13 ACK SIP ALG -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bhh ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and the ALG and between the ALG and B*/ /* Alice Hangs Up with Bob. */ F14 BYE Alice -> SIP ALG BYE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74be5 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:alg1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 52]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 F15 BYE SIP ALG -> Bob BYE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74be5 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 F16 200 OK Bob -> SIP ALG SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP alg1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK739578.1 ;received=192.0.2.128 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74be5 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 F17 200 OK SIP ALG -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74be5 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 53]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.6. Session via Redirect and Proxy Servers with SDP in ACK Alice Redirect Server Proxy 3 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| | | | 302 F2 | | | |<---------------| | | | ACK F3 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F4 | | |-------------------------------->| INVITE F5 | | 100 F6 |--------------->| |<--------------------------------| 180 F7 | | 180 F8 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | | 200 F9 | | 200 F10 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | ACK F11 | | |-------------------------------->| ACK F12 | | |--------------->| | Both Way RTP Media | |<================================================>| | | BYE F13 | | BYE F14 |<---------------| |<--------------------------------| | | 200 F15 | | |-------------------------------->| 200 F16 | | |--------------->| | | | In this scenario, Alice places a call to Bob using first a Redirect server then a Proxy Server. The INVITE message is first sent to the Redirect Server. The Server returns a 302 Moved Temporarily response (F2) containing a Contact header with Bob's current SIP address. Alice then generates a new INVITE and sends to Bob via the Proxy Server and the call proceeds normally. In this example, no SDP is present in the INVITE, so the SDP is carried in the ACK message. The call is terminated when Bob sends a BYE message. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 54]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Redirect Server INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKbf9f44 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F2 302 Moved Temporarily Redirect Proxy -> Alice SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKbf9f44 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=53fHlqlQ2 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@chicago.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 F3 ACK Alice -> Redirect Server ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKbf9f44 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=53fHlqlQ2 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F4 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 3 INVITE sip:bob@chicago.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 55]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 F5 INVITE Proxy 3 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 F6 100 Trying Proxy 3 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F7 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 3 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 ;received=192.0.2.233 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 56]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F8 180 Ringing Proxy 3 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Length: 0 F9 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 3 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 ;received=192.0.2.233 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 148 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.chicago.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.100 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F10 200 OK Proxy -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 57]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 148 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.chicago.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.100 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* ACK contains SDP of Alice since none present in INVITE */ F11 ACK Alice -> Proxy 3 ACK sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bq9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F12 ACK Proxy 3 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bq9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 58]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 ACK Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and Bob */ /* Bob Hangs Up with Alice. */ F13 BYE Bob -> Proxy 3 BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfgaw2 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss3.chicago.example.com;lr> From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F14 BYE Proxy 3 -> Alice BYE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 ;received=192.0.2.100 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfgaw2 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F15 200 OK Alice -> Proxy 3 SIP/2.0 200 OK Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 59]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss3.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e.1 ;received=192.0.2.233 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfgaw2 ;received=192.0.2.100 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 F16 200 OK Proxy 3 -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfgaw2 ;received=192.0.2.100 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 60]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.7. Session with re-INVITE (IP Address Change) Alice Proxy 2 Bob | F1 INVITE | | |------------------->| F2 INVITE | | F3 100 Trying |------------------->| |<-------------------| F4 180 Ringing | | F5 180 Ringing |<-------------------| |<-------------------| | | | F6 200 OK | | F7 200 OK |<-------------------| |<-------------------| | | F8 ACK | |---------------------------------------->| | Both Way RTP Media Established | |<=======================================>| | | | Bob changes IP address | | | | F9 INVITE | |<----------------------------------------| | F10 200 OK | |---------------------------------------->| | F11 ACK | |<----------------------------------------| | New RTP Media Stream | |<=======================================>| | F12 BYE | |---------------------------------------->| | F13 200 OK | |<----------------------------------------| | | This example shows a session in which the media changes midway through the session. When Bob's IP address changes during the session, Bob sends a re-INVITE containing a new Contact and SDP (version number incremented) information to A. In this flow, the proxy does not Record-Route so is not in the SIP messaging path after the initial exchange. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 61]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F2 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 62]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F3 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F4 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F5 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F6 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 63]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F7 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 147 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844527 IN IP4 client.biloxi.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.201 t=0 0 m=audio 3456 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F8 ACK Alice -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74b7b Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 64]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 /* RTP streams are established between Alice and Bob */ /* Bob changes IP address and re-INVITEs Alice with new Contact and SDP */ F9 INVITE Bob -> Alice INVITE sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKlkld5l Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 14 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 149 v=0 o=bob 2890844527 2890844528 IN IP4 client.chicago.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.100 t=0 0 m=audio 47172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F10 200 OK Alice -> Bob SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKlkld5l ;received=192.0.2.100 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 14 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 150 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 65]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 m=audio 1000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F11 ACK Bob -> Alice ACK sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.chicago.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKlkldcc Max-Forwards: 70 From: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 To: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 14 ACK Content-Length: 0 /* New RTP stream established between Alice and Bob */ /* Alice hangs up with Bob */ F12 BYE Alice -> Bob BYE sip:bob@client.chicago.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bo4 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 F13 200 OK Bob -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bo4 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 2 BYE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 66]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.8. Unsuccessful No Answer Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F2 | | | 100 F3 |--------------->| INVITE F4 | |<---------------| 100 F5 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | | 180 F6 | | | 180 F7 |<---------------| | 180 F8 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | | CANCEL F9 | | | |--------------->| | | | 200 F10 | | | |<---------------| CANCEL F11 | | | |--------------->| | | | 200 F12 | | | |<---------------| | | | | CANCEL F13 | | | |--------------->| | | | 200 F14 | | | |<---------------| | | | 487 F15 | | | |<---------------| | | | ACK F16 | | | 487 F17 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F18 | | | 487 F19 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F20 | | | |--------------->| | | | | | | In this scenario, Alice gives up on the call before Bob answers (sends a 200 OK response). Alice sends a CANCEL (F9) since no final response had been received from Bob. If a 200 OK to the INVITE had crossed with the CANCEL, Alice would have sent an ACK then a BYE to Bob in order to properly terminate the call. Note that the CANCEL message is acknowledged with a 200 OK on a hop by hop basis, rather than end to end. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 67]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="ze7k1ee88df84f1cec431ae6cbe5a359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="b00b416324679d7e243f55708d44be7b" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /*Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network.*/ F2 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 68]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F3 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F4 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> Max-Forwards: 68 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 69]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F5 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F6 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F7 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 70]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F8 180 Ringing Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F9 CANCEL Alice -> Proxy 1 CANCEL sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 F10 200 OK Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 71]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F11 CANCEL Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 CANCEL sip:alice@atlanta.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 F12 200 OK Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 F13 CANCEL Proxy 2 -> Bob CANCEL sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 F14 200 OK Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 72]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F15 487 Request Terminated Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F16 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F17 487 Request Terminated Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 73]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F18 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F19 487 Request Terminated Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE F20 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="ze7k1ee88df84f1cec431ae6cbe5a359", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="b00b416324679d7e243f55708d44be7b" CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 74]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.9. Unsuccessful Busy Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F2 | | | 100 F3 |--------------->| INVITE F4 | |<---------------| 100 F5 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | | 486 F6 | | | |<---------------| | | | ACK F7 | | | 486 F8 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F9 | | | 486 F10 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F11 | | | |--------------->| | | | | | | In this scenario, Bob is busy and sends a 486 Busy Here response to Alice's INVITE. Note that the non-2xx response is acknowledged on a hop-by-hop basis instead of end-to-end. Also note that many SIP UAs will not return a 486 response, as they have multiple line and other features. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="dc3a5ab2530aa93112cf5904ba7d88fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="702138b27d869ac8741e10ec643d55be" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 75]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /*Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network.*/ F2 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F3 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 76]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F4 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com;transport=tcp> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F5 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F6 486 Busy Here Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 77]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F7 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F8 486 Busy Here Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F9 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 78]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F10 486 Busy Here Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 486 Busy Here Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F11 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="dc3a5ab2530aa93112cf5904ba7d88fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="702138b27d869ac8741e10ec643d55be" Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 79]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.10. Unsuccessful No Response from User Agent Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F2 | | | 100 F3 |--------------->| INVITE F4 | |<---------------| 100 F5 |--------------->| | |<---------------| INVITE F6 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F7 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F8 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F9 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F10 | | | |--------------->| | | | INVITE F11 | | | 480 F12 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F13 | | | 480 F14 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F15 | | | |--------------->| | | | | | | In this example, there is no response from Bob to Alice's INVITE messages being re-transmitted by Proxy 2. After the sixth re-transmission, Proxy 2 gives up and sends a 480 No Response to Alice. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 80]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 nonce="cf5904ba7d8dc3a5ab2530aa931128fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="7afc04be7961f053c24f80e7dbaf888f" Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /*Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network.*/ F2 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F3 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 81]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F4 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F5 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 82]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F6 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 F7 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 F8 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 F9 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 F10 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 F11 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob Resend of Message F4 /* Proxy 2 gives up */ F12 480 No Response Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 480 No Response Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 83]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F13 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F14 480 No Response Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 480 No Response Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F15 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="cf5904ba7d8dc3a5ab2530aa931128fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="7afc04be7961f053c24f80e7dbaf888f" Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 84]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 3.11. Unsuccessful Temporarily Unavailable Alice Proxy 1 Proxy 2 Bob | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| INVITE F2 | | | 100 F3 |--------------->| INVITE F4 | |<---------------| 100 F5 |--------------->| | |<---------------| 180 F6 | | | 180 F7 |<---------------| | 180 F8 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | 480 F9 | | | |<---------------| | | | ACK F10 | | | 480 F11 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F12 | | | 480 F13 |--------------->| | |<---------------| | | | ACK F14 | | | |--------------->| | | | | | | In this scenario, Bob initially sends a 180 Ringing response to Alice, indicating that alerting is taking place. However, then a 480 Unavailable is then sent to Alice. This response is acknowledged then proxied back to Alice. Message Details F1 INVITE Alice -> Proxy 1 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="aa9311cf5904ba7d8dc3a5ab253028fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="59a46a91bf1646562a4d486c84b399db" Content-Type: application/sdp Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 85]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 /*Client for Alice prepares to receive data on port 49172 from the network.*/ F2 INVITE Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 INVITE sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F3 100 Trying Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 86]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Content-Length: 0 F4 INVITE Proxy 2 -> Bob INVITE sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Max-Forwards: 68 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:alice@client.atlanta.example.com> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 151 v=0 o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 client.atlanta.example.com s=- c=IN IP4 192.0.2.101 t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 F5 100 Trying Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com> Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 87]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F6 180 Ringing Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F7 180 Ringing Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Content-Length: 0 F8 180 Ringing Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 Record-Route: <sip:ss2.biloxi.example.com;lr>, <sip:ss1.atlanta.example.com;lr> From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com> Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 88]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 Content-Length: 0 F9 480 Temporarily Unavailable Bob -> Proxy 2 SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 ;received=192.0.2.222 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F10 ACK Proxy 2 -> Bob ACK sip:bob@client.biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss2.biloxi.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK721e4.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F11 480 Temporarily Unavailable Proxy 2 -> Proxy 1 SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 ;received=192.0.2.111 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 89]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 F12 ACK Proxy 1 -> Proxy 2 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP ss1.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4790.1 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 F13 480 Temporarily Unavailable Proxy 1 -> Alice SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily Unavailable Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 ;received=192.0.2.101 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 F14 ACK Alice -> Proxy 1 ACK sip:bob@biloxi.example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP client.atlanta.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bK74bf9 Max-Forwards: 70 From: Alice <sip:alice@atlanta.example.com>;tag=9fxced76sl To: Bob <sip:bob@biloxi.example.com>;tag=314159 Call-ID: 2xTb9vxSit55XU7p8@atlanta.example.com Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="alice", realm="atlanta.example.com", nonce="aa9311cf5904ba7d8dc3a5ab253028fa", opaque="", uri="sip:bob@biloxi.example.com", response="59a46a91bf1646562a4d486c84b399db" CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 90]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 4. Security Considerations Since this document contains examples of SIP session establishment, the security considerations in RFC 3261 [1] apply. RFC 3261 describes the basic threats including registration hijacking, server impersonation, message body tampering, session modifying or teardown, and denial of service and amplification attacks. The use of HTTP Digest as shown in this document provides one-way authentication and protection against replay attacks. TLS transport is used in registration scenarios due to the lack of integrity protection in HTTP Digest and the danger of registration hijacking without it, as described in RFC 3261 [1]. A full discussion of the weaknesses of HTTP Digest is provided in RFC 3261 [1]. The use of TLS and the Secure SIP (sips) URI scheme provides a better level of security including two-way authentication. S/MIME can provide end-to-end confidentiality and integrity protection of message bodies, as described in RFC 3261. 5. References 5.1. Normative References [1] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002. [2] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with SDP", RFC 3264, April 2002. [3] Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Lawrence, S., Leach, P., Luotonen, A. and L. Stewart, "HTTP authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication", RFC 2617, June 1999. [4] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. 5.2. Informative References [5] Johnston, A., Donovan, S., Sparks, R., Cunningham, C. and K. Summers, "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) Call Flows", BCP 76, RFC 3666, December 2003. 6. Intellectual Property Statement The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 91]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director. 7. Acknowledgments This document is has been a group effort by the SIP and SIPPING WGs. The authors wish to thank everyone who has read, reviewed, commented, or made suggestions to improve this document. Thanks to Rohan Mahy, Adam Roach, Gonzalo Camarillo, Cullen Jennings, and Tom Taylor for their detailed comments during the final review. Thanks to Dean Willis for his early contributions to the development of this document. The authors wish to thank Kundan Singh for performing parser validation of messages. The authors wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of this call flows document: Aseem Agarwal, Rafi Assadi, Ben Campbell, Sunitha Kumar, Jon Peterson, Marc Petit-Huguenin, Vidhi Rastogi, and Bodgey Yin Shaohua. The authors also wish to thank the following individuals for their assistance: Jean-Francois Mule, Hemant Agrawal, Henry Sinnreich, David Devanatham, Joe Pizzimenti, Matt Cannon, John Hearty, the whole MCI WorldCom IPOP Design team, Scott Orton, Greg Osterhout, Pat Sollee, Doug Weisenberg, Danny Mistry, Steve McKinnon, and Denise Ingram, Denise Caballero, Tom Redman, Ilya Slain, Pat Sollee, John Truetken, and others from MCI WorldCom, 3Com, Cisco, Lucent and Nortel. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 92]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 8. Authors' Addresses All listed authors actively contributed large amounts of text to this document. Alan Johnston MCI 100 South 4th Street St. Louis, MO 63102 USA EMail: alan.johnston@mci.com Steve Donovan dynamicsoft, Inc. 5100 Tennyson Parkway Suite 1200 Plano, Texas 75024 USA EMail: sdonovan@dynamicsoft.com Robert Sparks dynamicsoft, Inc. 5100 Tennyson Parkway Suite 1200 Plano, Texas 75024 USA EMail: rsparks@dynamicsoft.com Chris Cunningham dynamicsoft, Inc. 5100 Tennyson Parkway Suite 1200 Plano, Texas 75024 USA EMail: ccunningham@dynamicsoft.com Kevin Summers Sonus 1701 North Collins Blvd, Suite 3000 Richardson, TX 75080 USA EMail: kevin.summers@sonusnet.com Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 93]
RFC 3665 SIP Basic Call Flow Examples December 2003 9. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Johnston, et al. Best Current Practice [Page 94]
mirror server hosted at Truenetwork, Russian Federation.