This is a purely informative rendering of an RFC that includes verified errata. This rendering may not be used as a reference.
The following 'Verified' errata have been incorporated in this document:
EID 5578
Network Working Group E. Levinson
Request for Comments: 2387 August 1998
Obsoletes: 2112
Category: Standards Track
The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
The Multipart/Related content-type provides a common mechanism for
representing objects that are aggregates of related MIME body parts.
This document defines the Multipart/Related content-type and provides
examples of its use.
1. Introduction
Several applications of MIME, including MIME-PEM, and MIME-Macintosh
and other proposals, require multiple body parts that make sense only
in the aggregate. The present approach to these compound objects has
been to define specific multipart subtypes for each new object. In
keeping with the MIME philosophy of having one mechanism to achieve
the same goal for different purposes, this document describes a
single mechanism for such aggregate or compound objects.
The Multipart/Related content-type addresses the MIME representation
of compound objects. The object is categorized by a "type"
parameter. Additional parameters are provided to indicate a specific
starting body part or root and auxiliary information which may be
required when unpacking or processing the object.
Multipart/Related MIME entities may contain Content-Disposition
headers that provide suggestions for the storage and display of a
body part. Multipart/Related processing takes precedence over
Content-Disposition; the interaction between them is discussed in
section 4.
Responsibility for the display or processing of a Multipart/Related's
constituent entities rests with the application that handles the
compound object.
2. Multipart/Related Registration Information
The following form is copied from RFC 1590, Appendix A.
To: IANA@isi.edu
Subject: Registration of new Media Type content-type/subtype
Media Type name: Multipart
Media subtype name: Related
Required parameters: Type, a media type/subtype.
Optional parameters: Start
Start-info
Encoding considerations: Multipart content-types cannot have
encodings.
Security considerations: Depends solely on the referenced type.
Published specification: RFC-REL (this document).
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Edward Levinson
47 Clive Street
Metuchen, NJ 08840-1060
+1 908 494 1606
XIson@cnj.digex.net
3. Intended usage
The Multipart/Related media type is intended for compound objects
consisting of several inter-related body parts. For a
Multipart/Related object, proper display cannot be achieved by
individually displaying the constituent body parts. The content-type
of the Multipart/Related object is specified by the type parameter.
The "start" parameter, if given, points, via a content-ID, to the
body part that contains the object root. The default root is the
first body part within the Multipart/Related body.
The relationships among the body parts of a compound object
distinguishes it from other object types. These relationships are
often represented by links internal to the object's components that
reference the other components. Within a single operating
environment the links are often file names, such links may be
represented within a MIME message using content-IDs or the value of
some other "Content-" headers.
3.1. The Type Parameter
The type parameter must be specified and its value is the MIME media
type of the "root" body part. It permits a MIME user agent to
determine the content-type without reference to the enclosed body
part. If the value of the type parameter and the root body part's
content-type differ then the User Agent's behavior is undefined.
3.2. The Start Parameter
The start parameter, if given, is the content-ID of the compound
object's "root". If not present the "root" is the first body part in
the Multipart/Related entity. The "root" is the element the
applications processes first.
3.3. The Start-Info Parameter
Additional information can be provided to an application by the
start-info parameter. It contains either a string or points, via a
content-ID, to another MIME entity in the message. A typical use
might be to provide additional command line parameters or a MIME
entity giving auxiliary information for processing the compound
object.
Applications that use Multipart/Related must specify the
interpretation of start-info. User Agents shall provide the
parameter's value to the processing application. Processes can
distinguish a start-info reference from a token or quoted-string by
examining the first non-white-space character, "<" indicates a
reference.
3.4. Syntax
related-param := ( ";" "type" "=" type "/" subtype )
[ ";" "start" "=" cid ]
[ ";" "start-info" "="
( cid-list / value ) ]
; order independent, "type" is required
EID 5578 (Verified) is as follows:Section: 0.4
Original Text:
related-param := [ ";" "start" "=" cid ]
[ ";" "start-info" "="
( cid-list / value ) ]
[ ";" "type" "=" type "/" subtype ]
; order independent
Corrected Text:
related-param := ( ";" "type" "=" type "/" subtype )
[ ";" "start" "=" cid ]
[ ";" "start-info" "="
( cid-list / value ) ]
; order independent, "type" is required
Notes:
The "type" parameter is specified by the rest of the document to be mandatory, but the ABNF in section 3.4 indicates that it is optional. Even though the ABNF is specified somewhat informally (and arguably should be formalized if this RFC is ever re-issued), it should not be giving information that contradicts the formal part of the specification (e.g., section 2).
===== Verifier notes ===== As the reporter says, the ABNF here needs more work, and that should be held for document update. This particular item, though, does, indeed, contradict the normative text. I have also moved the required item to the top of the parameter list for clarity.
cid-list := cid cid-list
cid := msg-id ; c.f. [822]
value := token / quoted-string ; c.f. [MIME]
; value cannot begin with "<"
Note that the parameter values will usually require quoting. Msg-id
contains the special characters "<", ">", "@", and perhaps other
special characters. If msg-id contains quoted-strings, those quote
marks must be escaped. Similarly, the type parameter contains the
special character "/".
4. Handling Content-Disposition Headers
Content-Disposition Headers [DISP] suggest presentation styles for
MIME body parts. [DISP] describes two presentation styles, called
the disposition type, INLINE and ATTACHMENT. These, used within a
multipart entity, allow the sender to suggest presentation
information. [DISP] also provides for an optional storage (file)
name. Content-Disposition headers could appear in one or more body
parts contained within a Multipart/Related entity.
Using Content-Disposition headers in addition to Multipart/Related
provides presentation information to User Agents that do not
recognize Multipart/Related. They will treat the multipart as
Multipart/Mixed and they may find the Content-Disposition information
useful.
With Multipart/Related however, the application processing the
compound object determines the presentation style for all the
contained parts. In that context the Content-Disposition header
information is redundant or even misleading. Hence, User Agents that
understand Multipart/Related shall ignore the disposition type within
a Multipart/Related body part.
It may be possible for a User Agent capable of handling both
Multipart/Related and Content-Disposition headers to provide the
invoked application the Content-Disposition header's optional
filename parameter to the Multipart/Related. The use of that
information will depend on the specific application and should be
specified when describing the handling of the corresponding compound
object. Such descriptions would be appropriate in an RFC registering
that object's media type.
5. Examples
5.1 Application/X-FixedRecord
The X-FixedRecord content-type consists of one or more octet-streams
and a list of the lengths of each record. The root, which lists the
record lengths of each record within the streams. The record length
list, type Application/X-FixedRecord, consists of a set of INTEGERs
in ASCII format, one per line. Each INTEGER gives the number of
octets from the octet-stream body part that constitute the next
"record".
The example below, uses a single data block.
Content-Type: Multipart/Related; boundary=example-1
start="<950120.aaCC@XIson.com>";
type="Application/X-FixedRecord"
start-info="-o ps"
--example-1
Content-Type: Application/X-FixedRecord
Content-ID: <950120.aaCC@XIson.com>
25
10
34
10
25
21
26
10
--example-1
Content-Type: Application/octet-stream
Content-Description: The fixed length records
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <950120.aaCB@XIson.com>
T2xkIE1hY0RvbmFsZCBoYWQgYSBmYXJtCkUgSS
BFIEkgTwpBbmQgb24gaGlzIGZhcm0gaGUgaGFk
IHNvbWUgZHVja3MKRSBJIEUgSSBPCldpdGggYS
BxdWFjayBxdWFjayBoZXJlLAphIHF1YWNrIHF1
YWNrIHRoZXJlLApldmVyeSB3aGVyZSBhIHF1YW
NrIHF1YWNrCkUgSSBFIEkgTwo=
--example-1--
5.2 Text/X-Okie
The Text/X-Okie is an invented markup language permitting the
inclusion of images with text. A feature of this example is the
inclusion of two additional body parts, both picture. They are
referred to internally by the encapsulated document via each
picture's body part content-ID. Usage of "cid:", as in this example,
may be useful for a variety of compound objects. It is not, however,
a part of the Multipart/Related specification.
Content-Type: Multipart/Related; boundary=example-2;
start="<950118.AEBH@XIson.com>"
type="Text/x-Okie"
--example-2
Content-Type: Text/x-Okie; charset=iso-8859-1;
declaration="<950118.AEB0@XIson.com>"
Content-ID: <950118.AEBH@XIson.com>
Content-Description: Document
{doc}
This picture was taken by an automatic camera mounted ...
{image file=cid:950118.AECB@XIson.com}
{para}
Now this is an enlargement of the area ...
{image file=cid:950118:AFDH@XIson.com}
{/doc}
--example-2
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-ID: <950118.AFDH@XIson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-Description: Picture A
[encoded jpeg image]
--example-2
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-ID: <950118.AECB@XIson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-Description: Picture B
[encoded jpeg image]
--example-2--
5.3 Content-Disposition
In the above example each image body part could also have a Content-
Disposition header. For example,
--example-2
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-ID: <950118.AECB@XIson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-Description: Picture B
Content-Disposition: INLINE
[encoded jpeg image]
--example-2--
User Agents that recognize Multipart/Related will ignore the
Content-Disposition header's disposition type. Other User Agents
will process the Multipart/Related as Multipart/Mixed and may make
use of that header's information.
6. User Agent Requirements
User agents that do not recognize Multipart/Related shall, in
accordance with [MIME], treat the entire entity as Multipart/Mixed.
MIME User Agents that do recognize Multipart/Related entities but are
unable to process the given type should give the user the option of
suppressing the entire Multipart/Related body part shall be.
Existing MIME-capable mail user agents (MUAs) handle the existing
media types in a straightforward manner. For discrete media types
(e.g. text, image, etc.) the body of the entity can be directly
passed to a display process. Similarly the existing composite
subtypes can be reduced to handing one or more discrete types.
Handling Multipart/Related differs in that processing cannot be
reduced to handling the individual entities.
The following sections discuss what information the processing
application requires.
It is possible that an application specific "receiving agent" will
manipulate the entities for display prior to invoking actual
application process. Okie, above, is an example of this; it may need
a receiving agent to parse the document and substitute local file
names for the originator's file names. Other applications may just
require a table showing the correspondence between the local file
names and the originator's. The receiving agent takes responsibility
for such processing.
6.1 Data Requirements
MIME-capable mail user agents (MUAs) are required to provide the
application:
(a) the bodies of the MIME entities and the entity Content-* headers,
(b) the parameters of the Multipart/Related Content-type header, and
(c) the correspondence between each body's local file name, that
body's header data, and, if present, the body part's content-ID.
6.2 Storing Multipart/Related Entities
The Multipart/Related media type will be used for objects that have
internal linkages between the body parts. When the objects are
stored the linkages may require processing by the application or its
receiving agent.
6.3 Recursion
MIME is a recursive structure. Hence one must expect a
Multipart/Related entity to contain other Multipart/Related entities.
When a Multipart/Related entity is being processed for display or
storage, any enclosed Multipart/Related entities shall be processed
as though they were being stored.
6.4 Configuration Considerations
It is suggested that MUAs that use configuration mechanisms, see
[CFG] for an example, refer to Multipart/Related as Multi-
part/Related/<type>, were <type> is the value of the "type"
parameter.
7. Security Considerations
Security considerations relevant to Multipart/Related are identical
to those of the underlying content-type.
8. Acknowledgments
This proposal is the result of conversations the author has had with
many people. In particular, Harald A. Alvestrand, James Clark,
Charles Goldfarb, Gary Houston, Ned Freed, Ray Moody, and Don
Stinchfield, provided both encouragement and invaluable help. The
author, however, take full responsibility for all errors contained in
this document.
9. References
[822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet
Text Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.
[CID] Levinson, E., and J. Clark, "Message/External-Body
Content-ID Access Type", RFC 1873, December 1995,
Levinson, E., "Message/External-Body Content-ID Access
Type", Work in Progress.
[CFG] Borenstein, N., "A User Agent Configuration Mechanism For
Multimedia Mail Format Information", RFC 1524, September
1993.
[DISP] Troost, R., and S. Dorner, "Communicating Presentation
Information in Internet Messages: The Content-
Disposition Header", RFC 1806, June 1995.
[MIME] Borenstein, N., and Freed, N., "Multipurpose Internet
Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet
Message Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996.
9. Author's Address
Edward Levinson
47 Clive Street
Metuchen, NJ 08840-1060
USA
Phone: +1 908 494 1606
EMail: XIson@cnj.digex.com
10. Changes from previous draft (RFC 2112)
Corrected cid urls to conform to RFC 2111; the angle brackets were
removed.
11. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.