[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing concerns (MPL vs. LDP)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 08:36:15AM -0600, Matthew P. Barnson wrote:
> Please note: Because of current corporate concerns with Bugzilla
> maintainers, the documentation cannot currently be licensed under the GPL or
> Gnu Free Documentation License.
What are exactly that concerns?? The GFDL is here to protect both your
rights and your work, not to lessen them.
Consider the OPL -A -B (without options A and B) if you don't want the
GFDL, but I strongly advise you against choosing the MPL.
IMHO it is not a free license and would prevent your work from being
redistributed with the LDP documents, or in a separate 'commercial'
section.
--
Guylhem P. Aznar http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ----- Benjamin Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org