[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LDP project going online
Hello,
Actually he can use the LDP name. Legally we do not exist.
Joshua Drake
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 brichardson@lineone.net wrote:
>---------
>>From: Kevin Cullis <kevincu@orci.com>
>>To: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
>>Subject: Re: LDP project going online
>>Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 20:23:11 -0600
>>
>>
>>I'm putting together a new form of the LDP project which is along the
>>lines of what you've stated below:
>
>You are 100% free and welcome to do so but
>you can't use the LDP name in connection
>with it, not without serious discussion with the
>members of the current project.
>
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org