Here is a brief walkthrough of using CLOSURE in unsum.
Call closure_generate() to run the CLOSURE algorithm.
Enter mean, SD, and sample size that you read in a paper. For
scale_min and scale_max, use the empirical
minimum and maximum if available. Otherwise, use the more fundamental
scale bounds, e.g., 1 and 7 for a 1-7
scale.
The mean and sd arguments must be strings
to preserve trailing zeros. Note that CLOSURE can only be used if the
values must be integers: e.g., a value can be 2 or 3, but not 2.5.
data <- closure_generate(
mean = "3.5",
sd = "1.8",
n = 80,
scale_min = 1,
scale_max = 5
)
#>
#> ✔ All CLOSURE results foundFirst create a plot of the mean sample found by CLOSURE. This gives us a sense of the overall results, which are quite polarized:
You can customize the plot, e.g., to show the sum of all samples
found instead of the average sample, or only percentages, or different
colors. See documentation at closure_plot_bar(). However,
the default should be informative enough for a start.
Now let’s look at the results themselves:
data
#>
#> ── CLOSURE results: 2,215 samples ──────────────────────────────────────────────
#> $inputs · how `closure_generate()` produced these data
#> # A tibble: 1 × 8
#> technique mean sd n scale_min scale_max rounding threshold
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 CLOSURE 3.5 1.8 80 1 5 up_or_down 5
#> $metrics_main · key statistics about the generated samples
#> # A tibble: 1 × 2
#> samples_all values_all
#> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 2215 177200
#> $metrics_horns · on the distribution of horns index values
#> # A tibble: 1 × 9
#> mean uniform sd cv mad min median max range
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 0.792 0.5 0.0251 0.0317 0.0189 0.756 0.787 0.844 0.0877
#> $directory · where the results are saved on disk
#> # A tibble: 1 × 1
#> path
#> <chr>
#> 1 <NA>
#> With hidden elements:
#> ℹ Access $modality_counts for min/max counts per scale value (5 rows)
#> ℹ Access $modality_pairs for frequency ordering between adjacent values (4 rows)
#> ℹ Access $modality_conclusion for flagging modality and J-shape status (1 row)
#> ℹ Access $frequency for full frequency table (15 rows)
#> ℹ Access $frequency_dist for per-value count distributions (86 rows)
#> ℹ Access $results for all samples and their horns indices (2,215 rows)
#> # Use `print(show = "all")` to see all elements
#> # Use `print(show = "none")` to hide elementsinputs records the arguments in
closure_generate().
metrics_main shows the number of initial samples
that form the basis of CLOSURE (samples_initial), the total
number of possible samples that could have led to the reported summary
statistics (samples_all), and the total number of all
values found in them (values_all).
metrics_horns contains statistics about the “horns
index” of each sample, a measure of variation in bounded scales. It
ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 means no variability and 1 would be a sample
evenly split between the extremes — here, 1, and 5 — with no values in
between. In particular:
mean is the average horns index across all samples.
The reference value uniform shows which value
mean would have if the mean sample was uniformly
distributed. This is 0.5 because of the 1-5 scale. See
horns() for more details.
The actual mean horns index is 0.79, which is a high
degree of variability even in the abstract. In practice, 0.79 might be
extremely high compared to theoretical expectations: if the sample
should have a roughly normal shape, even the hypothetical 0.5 uniform
value would be surprisingly high, let alone the 0.79 actual
value.
The remaining statistics provide some clues about the variability among horns values. More on this below.
frequency shows the absolute and relative
frequencies of values found by CLOSURE at each scale point. It also
contains the (absolute) frequency of values in the average sample that
we saw in the plot above. The samples column indicates to
which subset of the samples a row belongs:
all is aggregated across all samples.
horns_min concerns the subset of samples that have
the lowest horns index from among all samples.
horns_max, conversely, is about the subset of
samples with the highest horns index.
results stores all the samples that CLOSURE found
(sample) and the corresponding horns index values
(horns). Each has a unique number
(id).
See closure_generate() for more details.
In addition to the bar plot, unsum offers an ECDF plot for CLOSURE results:
You may wonder about variability between the samples. Couldn’t there
be some with a much lower or higher horns index than the overall mean
horns? In this case, there would be a chance that the
original data looked quite different from the average.
To check this, first use closure_plot_bar(). It shows
the minimum and maximum possible variability as measured by the horns
index, i.e., the average distributions of those samples with the lowest
and highest horns index values:
As you can see, the variability does not change very much. The distribution is starkly bimodal even with the lowest possible amount of variability.
In sum, the horns values are quite tightly confined. Wide variation
among them seems to occur only if mean and sd
have no decimal places.
What if you have a huge object with CLOSURE results that you want to
save? Write it to disk with closure_write():
# Using a temporary folder via `tempdir()` just for this example --
# you should use a real folder on your computer instead!
path_new_folder <- closure_write(data, path = tempdir())
#>
#> ✔ All CLOSURE files written to:
#> /var/folders/z6/t79c19k13tl177xn70n2ybc80000gn/T//RtmpoNSybL/CLOSURE-3_5-1_8-80-1-5-up_or_down-5/This stores the results using the highly efficient Parquet format. It will only take a tiny fraction of a CSV file’s disk space.
In your later session, read the data in from the folder to get the same CLOSURE list back:
A caveat: don’t modify the output of closure_generate()
before passing it into other closure_*() functions. The
latter need input with a very specific format, and if you manipulate the
data between two closure_*() calls, these assumptions may
no longer hold. Some checks are in place to detect alterations, but they
may not catch all of them.