version 3.18
data(RS)
Original data used by Caren and Panofsky (2005), and reanalysed by Ragin and Strand (2008).
A data frame containing 17 cases and the following 6 columns:
| P | 
| Public university | 
| E | 
| Support of elite allies | 
| A | 
| National union affiliation | 
| S | 
| Strike or a strike threat | 
| EBA | 
| E happens before A | 
| REC | 
| Union recognition | 
The causal conditions are P, E, A and S.
All of them are binary crisp with two values: 0 = No and 1 = Yes.
The column EBA is not a causal condition, specifying in which case the
causal condition E happens before the causal condition A. It has
two values (0 = No and 1 = Yes) plus the placeholder "-"
to signal a don't care.
The outcome is the union recognition EBA, also binary crisp with two values:
0 = No and 1 = Yes.
Caren, N; Panofsky, A. (2005) TQCA: A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research vol. 34, no.2, pp.147-172.
Ragin, C.C.; Strand, S.I. (2008) Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Study Causal Order: Comment on Caren and Panofsky (2005). Sociological Methods & Research vol.36, no.4, pp.431-441.